Teamsters Strike May Arise for Companies that Haul
Vehicles to Dealerships
Source: The Atlanta Journal and Constitution
Publication date: 2003-05-30
Arrival time: 2003-05-29
May 30--Contract talks between the Teamsters union and companies that
haul cars, trucks and SUVs to dealerships could run out of time this
weekend, raising the possibility of a strike.
At best, a strike would disrupt deliveries to car lots. At worst, it
could stop auto production.
Much depends on the length of any strike and the number of auto-hauling
companies hit.
If the talks fail, one reason could be executive compensation at Allied
Holdings, a Decatur company that is the biggest car hauler in the
industry. It's the same issue that sabotaged a concessions agreement at
American Airlines and that struggling Delta Air Lines faces in seeking
financial help from its pilots.
The 9,000 Teamsters employed at Allied Holdings and 14 other companies
have authorized a strike, should talks fail to produce a labor agreement
by midnight Saturday night.
The union accuses Allied of "pulling an American Airlines" by paying
bonuses and granting salary increases to executives while asking for
benefit and wage concessions from Teamsters who ferry cars from
manufacturers to dealers.
"While certainly (executive pay) was a factor for our members as they
considered the strike vote, it was not the only factor," said Rob Black,
a Teamsters spokesman in Washington.
Allied Holdings declined to comment because the bargaining continues in
Arlington, Va.
Hugh Sawyer, the company's chief executive, was paid $539,388 in 2002,
his first full year in that job, and got a bonus of $825,000. A third of
the bonus was a reward for refinancing company debt. He also was granted
options on 100,000 shares of Allied Holdings stock.
Under Sawyer, Allied Holdings cut its full-year loss to $3.7 million
last year from $39.5 million in 2001.
The Teamsters acknowledge that Allied Holdings and other car haulers
need help because of the economy and increasing competition from
nonunion companies. But bonuses and pay increases for executives at
Allied, as well as a direct appeal by the company to employees, have the
Teamsters balking at giving anything back.
On April 23, six days before Allied Holdings filed its proxy statement
with executive pay numbers, the company sent a letter to union
employees, asking them to voluntarily defer payment for unused sick and
personal days, give up two vacation days this year, and not submit
miscellaneous pay claims in May, June or July.
The letter laid out concessions that management and other nonunion
employees had made, including an agreement by Sawyer to work four weeks
this year without pay.
The voluntary concessions Allied wants would come on top of other
sacrifices sought at the bargaining table, according to the Teamsters.
The car-hauling companies have asked for breaks on health care, which
currently doesn't cost Teamsters anything unless they have to pick up
part of a bill for drugs. The companies also want concessions on pay
rates for beginning drivers, according to the Teamsters.
The union is not disclosing specific proposals made by the companies.
Allied, which has about 6,600 employees, including 4,300 drivers, is
negotiating simultaneously but separately from the association that
represents other unionized car haulers.
For their part, the Teamsters at Allied and the other hauling companies
want job security and "some wage increase," said Bret Caldwell, another
Teamster spokesman. Currently, the average driver makes about $20.54 a
hour.
Those drivers move four out of every five new cars sold in the United
States, said Black, of the Teamsters. Allied's drivers hauled 9.4
million vehicles last year, including cars and vans from the Ford
Hapeville and General Motors Doraville plants.
"Any job action would have an impact nationwide," Black said.
"Before long, it would pretty much shut down the industry," offered auto
analyst David Healy of Burnham Securities.
Not necessarily, according to Sean McAlinden, chief economist at the
Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich. As they have in the
past, dealers could drive vehicles from assembly plants or terminals to
keep cars on their lots. Therefore, production could continue, he said.
Even so, a strike lasting more than 15 days would start to hurt dealers
because the selection on car lots would thin, said Paul Taylor, chief
economist for the National Automobile Dealers Association.
A shorter strike, perhaps five days, "would probably be a blessing" for
some companies that are struggling to sell cars, Taylor said.
Longer term, a dwindling assortment of cars at dealerships could turn
off some would-be buyers, he said. With neither auto sales nor the
economy robust, a strike is "not good timing now," Taylor said.
But with assembly lines already slowed because of weaker sales, auto
workers don't have much to worry about "unless it is a very prolonged
strike, more than a month," he said.
read
3298 times
|